CODEWITHSUNDEEP
javascriptsettimeoutsetinterval
aditya
aditya

Reputation: 1998

setInterval/setTimeout return value

Two questions:

  1. How is the value returned from setInterval and setTimeout (the ones used to clear the timers) calculated?

  2. Is it possible for both the functions to return the same value during runtime? For example:

    var a = setInterval(fn1, 1000);
    var b = setTimeout(fn2, 1000);

Is it possible for a and b to have the same value?

The first one is more of a for-my-knowledge question, but the second one is more important.

Upvotes: 43

Views: 65854

Answers (6)

Plater
Plater

Reputation: 105

It sounds to me that the returned value is the index value for whatever internally maintained list of timers/intervals they are keeping.

As in point, I called clearInterval(18) instead of clearInterval(var_returned_from_set) and it stopped the desired timer/interval. (Tested FF17.0.1 and IE9.0.8)

Also in my own testing they appear to be unique for the lifetime of the page for both of those browsers.

Upvotes: 0

cgp
cgp

Reputation: 41381

Returns a value which can be used to cancel the timer. So, it would seem unlikely that they return the same value (unless they are reusing values and one of the timers has already been cancelled)

Mozilla states it's DOM level 0, but not part of the specification. (look at the bottom of the page)

I've got an even better reference:

Nabble says:

SetTimeout and setInterval are from the original Javascript specification, pre-ECMA. That specification is not officially standardized anywhere, but it is supported by all web browsers and most implementations of the Javascript language. (Including ActionScript.)

The pre-ECMA specs are often known as the "DOM-0" APIs. Since they have never been standardized before, it makes sense for HTML5 to finally spec the non-deprecated APIs in an attempt to provide a consistent environment across browsers. Especially when recent events have proven that there are companies who like to implement the letter of the standard, but not the spirit.

Read the original spec here, or from Sun (who was an early endorser of JavaScript).

Upvotes: 39

Alex Rozanski
Alex Rozanski

Reputation: 38005

Tested this under Opera 9, Safari 3, Firefox 3 and IE 7.

All returned integer values, starting at 1 and then incrementing by 1 for each call to setTimeOut() and setInterval(). However, I noticed that the browsers started the counters and handled them differently:

  • IE started with a (seemingly) random 6-digit number, but subsequent calls to either function incremented this number. After closing and reopening IE I found that the starting number appeared to be randomly generated, as it was nowhere near the count from the previous session.
  • Opera maintained a counter for each tab - closing a tab and opening a new one started the counter from 1 in the new tab.
  • In Safari, the count was global - opening a new tab and calling the functions in different tabs seemed to increment a global reference counter.
  • In Firefox, the counter appeared to start at 2, and incremented on each subsequent call to either function. Like Opera, each tab had its own counter value, but they appeared to all start at 2.

Notice though, that in all the scenarios, no two identifiers (at least in the same tab) are the same.

Upvotes: 36

Mario Menger
Mario Menger

Reputation: 5902

Whether they can have the same value depends on the JavaScript implementation. As Maciej mentioned in Firefox they can't have the same value as the same counter is used. However, that might be different in other browsers, so it is perhaps best not to rely on them never having the same value.

Upvotes: 2

Maciej Łebkowski
Maciej Łebkowski

Reputation: 3887

I think it’s not a standarized behavior. In firefox, it’s just integer, incrementing on each call of setTimeout or setInterval. And, no, they can’t have the same value.

Upvotes: 8

Ropstah
Ropstah

Reputation: 17794

From the Mozilla website:

intervalID is a unique interval ID you can pass to clearInterval().

So it is unique :)

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions