CODEWITHSUNDEEP
abap
Siva
Siva

Reputation: 3738

Difference between Standard table and Hashed table Abap

Can you please give me a clear explanation on the difference between using "standard table of", "Hashed table of", or simply "table of". Also what is the meaning of "initial size 0"?

For reference please have a look in to below code..

it_c01_d006_raw TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF /bic/ac01_d00600
                       INITIAL SIZE 0,
it_c01_d006     TYPE HASHED TABLE OF /bic/ac01_d00600
                       WITH UNIQUE KEY /bic/cemployee /bic/cdatetype,
it_c01_d002     TYPE TABLE OF /bic/ac01_d00200.

Upvotes: 9

Views: 44739

Answers (2)

Dhivya
Dhivya

Reputation: 518

Standard table

This is the most appropriate type if you are going to address the individual table entries using the index. Index access is the quickest possible access. You should fill a standard table by appending lines (ABAP APPEND statement), and read, modify and delete entries by specifying the index (INDEX option with the relevant ABAP command). The access time for a standard table increases in a linear relationship with the number of table entries. If you need key access, standard tables are particularly useful if you can fill and process the table in separate steps. For example, you could fill the table by appending entries, and then sort it. If you use the binary search option with key access, the response time is logarithmically proportional to the number of table entries.

Hashed tables

This is the most appropriate type for any table where the main operation is key access. You cannot access a hashed table using its index. The response time for key access remains constant, regardless of the number of table entries. Like database tables, hashed tables always have a unique key. Hashed tables are useful if you want to construct and use an internal table which resembles a database table or for processing large amounts of data.manu

Upvotes: 7

Esti
Esti

Reputation: 3687

The meaning of TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF and TYPE TABLE OF is exactly the same, STANDARD is implied if nothing else is specified. However, in the OO-context you are now expected to declare internal tables fully and you would not be able to leave out the STANDARD addition. In this case it is just a stock-standard internal table that can be accessed by reading per the table index, or by key if you have sorted the table manually.

A table of TYPE HASHED TABLE creates an internal table that is represented using an internal HASH algorithm, allowing reads to the table where the cost is (by approximation) independent from the size of the table. Using this type of table is good when you have large data-sets with a lot of reads, but comparatively few writes. When declaring a hash table you have to also declare a UNIQUE KEY, as the HASH algorithm is dependent on this.

INITIAL SIZE 0 is also a redundant use of code - it means that memory allocation will occur in set blocks. (I'm not sure if this size is predefined, or configurable by BASIS), but INITIAL SIZE 0 is the default. If you wanted memory allocation to happen in sets of 10 times the number of lines in your internal table, you would have used 'INITIAL SIZE 10', but in most cases leaving the default memory allocation is better than trying to force it.

In addition

A table of TYPE SORTED TABLE can be declared with either an UNIQUE or a NON-UNIQUE key. The cost to read a record is less than that of a STANDARD table, as it allows a BINARY SEARCH, but more than that of a HASHED table. The cost to write is slightly more expensive than a STANDARD table, but less than that of a HASHED table.

Upvotes: 19

Related Questions