Reputation: 41002
I am trying to practice a little bit with cpp and want to make a class of linked list and than to manipulate it reverse it, finding circle and etc. but I can't understand what is the problem with my ctor/
I have this main:
#include "list.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main () {
int x = 10;
ListNode<int> node4();
ListNode<int> node3(10 ,node4);
}
while this is "list.h" :
#ifndef LIST_NODE_H
#define LIST_NODE_H
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
template <class T>
class ListNode {
ListNode* next;
T data;
public:
ListNode<T>( T dat = 0 ,const ListNode<T> &nex = NULL):data(dat),next(nex){};
};
#endif
I can't understand why this line: ListNode<int> node3(10 ,node4);
makes this errors, what is the problem?
list.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: list.cpp:12:33: error: invalid conversion from ‘ListNode ()()’ to ‘int’ [-fpermissive] list.h:15:3: error: initializing argument 1 of ‘ListNode::ListNode(T, const ListNode&) [with T = int]’ [-fpermissive] list.cpp:12:33: warning: passing NULL to non-pointer argument 1 of ‘ListNode::ListNode(T, const ListNode&) [with T = int]’ [-Wconversion-null] list.cpp:12:33: error: recursive evaluation of default argument for ‘ListNode::ListNode(T, const ListNode&) [with T = int]’ list.h:15:3: warning: in passing argument 2 of ‘ListNode::ListNode(T, const ListNode&) [with T = int]’ [enabled by default] list.h: In constructor ‘ListNode::ListNode(T, const ListNode&) [with T = int]’: list.cpp:12:33: instantiated from here list.h:15:76: error: cannot convert ‘const ListNode’ to ‘ListNode’ in initialization
Upvotes: 0
Views: 573
Reputation: 44131
You have a number of errors with your code:
In your constructor you have a null
reference as your default value, which is invalid (see here).
For a constructor with no arguments you need to omit the ()
(you can read about why here)
Something like this should work:
using namespace std;
template <class T>
class ListNode {
ListNode* next;
T data;
public:
ListNode<T>( T dat = 0 ,ListNode<T> * nex = NULL):data(dat),next(nex){};
};
int main(){
ListNode<int> node4;
ListNode<int> node3(10, &node4);
}
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 3180
Default parameters are evil (IMO).
(just a thought) Create different constructors (one with no parameters, one with parameters, ... )
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 25505
There are a couple of problems here.
First you don't need ListNode<T>()
simpley ListNode(...)
for the constructor.
Second you can't have a defalut for a reference parameter to null if there is the potential for nex to be null it needs to be a pointer.
Upvotes: 2