Reputation: 2591
I have a class with an accessor member function that I want to call and apply the result to a functor using std::for_each. I have a working version below that uses a for loop and for_each, but the for_each version is cryptic and cumbersome. Is there a way I can make the for_each version more concise, considering I have access to boost, but not C++11?
#if 0
// for loop version:
for(value_vector_type::iterator it = values.begin(); it!=values.end(); it++){
avg(it->getValue()); // I want to put this in a for_each loop
}
#else
// bind version:
std::for_each(values.begin(), values.end(), // iterate over all values
boost::bind(
boost::mem_fn(&average_type::operator()), // attach the averaging functor to the output of the getvalue call
&avg,
boost::bind(
boost::mem_fn(&value_wrapper_type::getValue), // bind the getValue call to each element in values
_1
)
)
);
#endif
Here is the full working implementation:
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/bind.hpp>
#include <boost/bind/mem_fn.hpp>
// A value wrapper
template<typename T>
struct Value {
Value(){}
Value(const T& value, bool valid = true):m_value(value),m_valid(valid){}
T getValue(){ return m_value; }
bool getValid(){ return m_valid; }
void setValue(const T& value){ m_value = value; }
void setValid(const T& valid){ m_valid = valid; }
private:
T m_value;
bool m_valid;
};
// Class that calculates the average piecewise
template<typename T>
struct Average {
private:
T m_numPoints;
T m_ChannelSum;
public:
Average() : m_numPoints(0), m_ChannelSum(0.0){}
void operator()(T value){
m_numPoints++;
m_ChannelSum+=value;
}
double getAverage(){ return m_ChannelSum/m_numPoints; }
T getCount(){ return m_numPoints; }
T getSum(){ return m_ChannelSum; }
};
// Run the average computation on several values
int main(int argc, char** argv){
typedef int value_type;
typedef Value<value_type> value_wrapper_type;
typedef std::vector<value_wrapper_type> value_vector_type;
value_vector_type values;
values.push_back(value_wrapper_type(5));
values.push_back(value_wrapper_type(7));
values.push_back(value_wrapper_type(3));
values.push_back(value_wrapper_type(1));
values.push_back(value_wrapper_type(2));
typedef Average<value_type> average_type;
average_type avg;
#if 0
// for loop version:
for(value_vector_type::iterator it = values.begin(); it!=values.end(); it++){
avg(it->getValue()); // I want to put this in a for_each loop
}
#else
// bind version:
std::for_each(values.begin(), values.end(), // iterate over all values
boost::bind(
boost::mem_fn(&average_type::operator()), // attach the averaging functor to the output of the getvalue call
&avg,
boost::bind(
boost::mem_fn(&value_wrapper_type::getValue), // bind the getValue call to each element in values
_1
)
)
);
#endif
std::cout << "Average: " << avg.getAverage() << " Count: " << avg.getCount() << " Sum: " << avg.getSum() << std::endl;
}
note: my original question was how to construct a for_each at all, but I've found that solution and a whole new question did not make much sense.
Thanks, all help is really appreciated!
Upvotes: 2
Views: 958
Reputation: 18210
One way to make it look neater is to use Boost.Phoenix. You can shorten down to this:
std::for_each(values.begin(), values.end(), lazy(avg)(arg1.getValue()));
Heres how to do that. First thing you need to do is make the avg
function object lazy. The simplest way to that is in-place with a function, defined like this:
template<class Function>
function<Function> lazy(Function x)
{
return function<Function>(x);
}
Next thing you need to do is write a function object for getValue, that can be lazy, like this:
struct get_value_impl
{
// result_of protocol:
template <typename Sig>
struct result;
template <typename This, typename T>
struct result<This(Value<T>&)>
{
// The result will be T
typedef typename T type;
};
template <typename V>
typename result<get_value_impl(V &)>::type
operator()(V & value) const
{
return value.getValue();
}
};
Thirdly, we extend the phoenix actors, using our get_value_impl
class, so it will have a getValue
method, like this:
template <typename Expr>
struct value_actor
: actor<Expr>
{
typedef actor<Expr> base_type;
typedef value_actor<Expr> that_type;
value_actor( base_type const& base )
: base_type( base ) {}
typename expression::function<get_value_impl, that_type>::type const
getValue() const
{
function<get_value_impl> const f = get_value_impl();
return f(*this);
}
};
Finally, we put it all together by defining the argument and passing it into the for_each algorithm:
expression::terminal<phoenix::argument<1>, value_actor> arg1;
std::for_each(values.begin(), values.end(), lazy(avg)(arg1.getValue()));
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1
If you can use boost, but not C++11 features, then I would consider using the BOOST_FOREACH macro
Yes, it's a macro, but as macros go it's well behaved
It's also reads quite nicely and is hard to get wrong
BOOST_FOREACH(const Value& rValue, values)
{
avg(rValue.getValue());
}
C++11 range based for loops will replace it
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 2591
Credit goes to Mathias Gaunard on the boost.users mailing list for pointing me towards this solution:
std::for_each(values.begin(), values.end(),
boost::bind(boost::ref(avg), boost::bind(&value_wrapper_type::getValue, _1))
);
Wrapping avg
with boost::ref
is required because otherwise a copy of avg
is filled out with the results of getValue()
, rather than avg
itself.
Here is the full compiled and tested solution:
#include <stdexcept>
#include <vector>
#include <algorithm>
#include <iostream>
#include <boost/bind.hpp>
#include <boost/bind/mem_fn.hpp>
// A value wrapper
template<typename T>
struct Value {
Value(){}
Value(const T& value, bool valid = true):m_value(value),m_valid(valid){}
T getValue(){ return m_value; }
bool getValid(){ return m_valid; }
void setValue(const T& value){ m_value = value; }
void setValid(const T& valid){ m_valid = valid; }
private:
T m_value;
bool m_valid;
};
// Class that calculates the average piecewise
template<typename T>
struct Average {
private:
T m_numPoints;
T m_ChannelSum;
public:
typedef void result_type;
Average() : m_numPoints(0), m_ChannelSum(0.0){}
result_type operator()(T value){
m_numPoints++;
m_ChannelSum+=value;
}
double getAverage(){
if (m_ChannelSum==0) {
throw std::logic_error("Cannot get average of zero values");
}
return m_ChannelSum/m_numPoints;
}
T getCount(){ return m_numPoints; }
T getSum(){ return m_ChannelSum; }
};
// Run the average computation on several values
int main(int argc, char** argv){
typedef int value_type;
typedef Value<value_type> value_wrapper_type;
typedef std::vector<value_wrapper_type> value_vector_type;
value_vector_type values;
values.push_back(value_wrapper_type(5));
values.push_back(value_wrapper_type(7));
values.push_back(value_wrapper_type(3));
values.push_back(value_wrapper_type(1));
values.push_back(value_wrapper_type(2));
typedef Average<value_type> average_type;
average_type avg;
#if 0
// for loop version:
for(value_vector_type::iterator it = values.begin(); it!=values.end(); it++){
avg(it->getValue()); // I want to put this in a for_each loop
}
#else
// bind version:
std::for_each(values.begin(), values.end(),
boost::bind(boost::ref(avg), boost::bind(&value_wrapper_type::getValue, _1))
);
#endif
std::cout << "Average: " << avg.getAverage() << " Count: " << avg.getCount() << " Sum: " << avg.getSum() << std::endl;
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 16158
if you are using c++11 then you can try
for(auto& a: values)
avg(a->getValue());
or
std::for_each(a.begin(), a.end(), [](whatever_type& wt){
avg(wt->getValue());
});
If you are not, then I think that toy have as good as your going to get although formatting wont hurt.
for(value_vector_type::iterator it = values.begin();
it!=values.end();
++it)
{
avg(it.getValue()); // I want to put this in a for_each loop
}
Trying to be too clever with function object and the like can often have the inverse effect of obscuring your code.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 153840
If you don't have C++11 but Boost you could try a bind()
expression (which would also work with C++2011 as bind()
is part of C++2011):
std::for_each(a.begin(), a.end(), bind(&avg<value_type>, bind(&Value<value_type>::getValue, _1)));
Upvotes: 2