Reputation: 3324
I have two tables.
I query like this:
SELECT * FROM (
Select requester_name,receiver_name from poem_authors_follow_requests as one
UNION
Select requester_name,receiver_name from poem_authors_friend_requests as two
) as u
where (LOWER(requester_name)=LOWER('user1') or LOWER(receiver_name)=LOWER('user1'))
I am using UNION because i want to get distinct values for each user if a user exists in the first table and in the second.
For example:
table1
nameofuser
peter
table2
nameofuser
peter
if peter is on either table i should get the name one time because it exists on both tables.
Still i get one row from first table and a second from table number two. What is wrong?
Any help appreciated.
Upvotes: 11
Views: 93221
Reputation: 20391
In your where statement, reference the alias "u" for each field refence in your where statement.
So the beginning of your where statement would be like: where (LOWER(u.requester_name) = ...
This is simlar to the answer you can see in: WHERE statement after a UNION in SQL?
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 35
You can use UNION if you want to select rows one after the other from several tables or several sets of rows from a single table all as a single result set. UNION is available as of MySQL 4.0. This section illustrates how to use it. Suppose you have two tables that list prospective and actual customers, a third that lists vendors from whom you purchase supplies, and you want to create a single mailing list by merging names and addresses from all three tables. UNION provides a way to do this. Assume the three tables have the following contents:
http://w3webtutorial.blogspot.com/2013/11/union-in-mysql.html
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 65264
There are two problems with your SQL:
(THis is not the question, but should be considered) by using WHERE
over the UNION
instead of the tables, you create a performance nightmare: MySQL will create a temporary table containing the UNION
, then query it over the WHERE
. Using a calculation on a field (LOWER(requester_name)
) makes this even worse.
The reason you get two rows is, that UNION DISTINCT
will only suppress real duplicates, so the tuple (someuser,peter)
and the tuple (someotheruser, peter)
will result in duplication.
Edit
To make (someuser, peter)
a duplicate of (peter, someuser)
you could use:
SELECT
IF(requester_name='peter', receiver_name, requester_name) AS otheruser
FROM
...
UNION
SELECT
IF(requester_name='peter', receiver_name, requester_name) AS otheruser
FROM
...
So you only select someuser
which you already know : peter
Upvotes: 15
Reputation: 1022
You should be able to use the INTERSECT
keyword instead of doing a nested query on a UNION
.
SELECT member_id, name FROM a
INTERSECT
SELECT member_id, name FROM b
can simply be rewritten to
SELECT a.member_id, a.name
FROM a INNER JOIN b
USING (member_id, name)
http://www.bitbybit.dk/carsten/blog/?p=71
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 31250
You are doing the union before and then applying the where clause. So you would get a unique combination of "requester_name,receiver_name" and then the where clause would apply. Apply the where clause in each select...
Select requester_name,receiver_name from poem_authors_follow_requests
where (LOWER(requester_name)=LOWER('user1')
or LOWER(receiver_name)=LOWER('user1'))
UNION
Select requester_name,receiver_name from poem_authors_friend_requests
where (LOWER(requester_name)=LOWER('user1')
or LOWER(receiver_name)=LOWER('user1'))
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 424983
You need the where clause on both selects:
select requester_name, receiver_name
from poem_authors_follow_requests
where LOWER(requester_name) = LOWER('user1') or LOWER(receiver_name) = LOWER('user1')
union
select requester_name, receiver_name
from poem_authors_friend_requests
where LOWER(requester_name) = LOWER('user1') or LOWER(receiver_name) = LOWER('user1')
The two queries are independent of each other, so you shouldn't try to connect them other than by union
.
Upvotes: 2