CODEWITHSUNDEEP
algorithmparallel-processing
moogs
moogs

Reputation: 8202

Fast Interleaving of Data

I'm working with some piece of hardware (the hardware itself is not important) and I need to split some block data intro separate pieces in order to make the thing run faster.

So I have, for example a contiguous block of memory X words long. For visualization, I'm arranging it into 50 word lines below:

001  002  003  004  005 006 007 ...
051  052  053  054  055 056 057 ...
101  102  103  104  105 106 107 ...
151  152  153  154  155 156 157 ...

I need a fast way of splitting these into four separate blocks:

Block1

001  003  005 007 ...
101  103  105 107 ...

Block2

002  004  006 ...
102  104  106 ...

Block3

051  053  055 057 ...
151  153  155 157 ...

Block4

052  054  056 ...
152  154  156 ...

Or, basically:

Block1   Block2   Block1   Block2 ...
Block3   Block4   Block3   Block4 ...
Block1   Block2   Block1   Block2 ...
Block3   Block4   Block3   Block4 ...

Now doing this is as simple as using for-loops. But what is a more optimized/parallel way of doing this? (No MPI stuff, this happens on an app running on the desktop).

So summing it up, just to be clear:

  1. I have data as shown above.

  2. I'm sending this data several devices (outside the PC). This data needs to be sent down the wire as 4 separate blocks (to the separate devices).

Upvotes: 0

Views: 279

Answers (2)

MSalters
MSalters

Reputation: 179819

This is a prime example where SSE can help you. It's very good at data shuffling as well as streaming data from memory and back. On some non-x86 architectures, there are similar ISA extensions available (e.g. AltiVec)

Upvotes: 1

SingleNegationElimination
SingleNegationElimination

Reputation: 156158

EDIT: It sounds like you're passing the data to an external interface. If this is anything as slow as a gigabit ethernet interface, then the bottleneck will be at the wire and not how quickly you can compose data. Just iterate over the data to build your blocks in any manner that seems convenient for your code.

Perhaps what you want to do is pass the blocks around using an offset/stride notation. Essentially, each block is described from its starting address, the into the block where the first element appears, the number of bytes between elements, and the number of bytes between rows. So, something like: 

       Block
         1    2    3    4
base     0    0    50   50
first    0    1    0    1
offset   2    2    2    2
stride   100  100  100  100

So you could work on the data in parallel (assuming you don't have to worry about writes) something like this

struct Block {
    int base;
    int first;
    int offset;
    int stride;
    int cols; rows;
};

/* given some reasonable block[n] and buffer */

for ( int row = 0; col < block[n].rows; ++row)
    for (int col = 0; row < block[n].cols; ++col)
    {
        int cell = buffer[
                      block[n].base + 
                      block[n].first +
                      row*block[n].stride + 
                      col*block[n].offset]
        doSomething(cell);
    }

Upvotes: 0

Related Questions