StackOverflow Questions for Tag: c%2B%2B03

dhaumann

Reputation: 1688

Is removing 'explicit' from a constructor binary compatible?

c++c++03explicit-constructor

Score: 9

Answers: 2

MLS

Reputation: 645

looser throw specifier for in C++

c++xcodegccc++03c++98

Score: 7

Answers: 2

Refugnic Eternium

Reputation: 4291

Eliminate functions from template class in C++03

c++sfinaec++03

Score: 13

Answers: 2

Kirill V. Lyadvinsky

Reputation: 99535

How to write `is_complete` template?

c++templatestype-traitsc++03

Score: 31

Answers: 8

Penny Dreudter

Reputation: 731

Accessing an enum value in a nested templated class in C++03

c++enumsc++03

Score: 7

Answers: 2

Alexander Oh

Reputation: 25601

Union initialization in C++ and C

c++cinitializationunionsc++03

Score: 40

Answers: 5

Sir2B

Reputation: 1079

Why is GCC complaining with Wstringop-overflow?

c++c++03gcc-warninggcc9

Score: 1

Answers: 1

Johannes Schaub - litb

Reputation: 506837

Is C++03 a new version of the C++ Standard or just a Technical Corrigendum (TC) of C++98?

c++language-lawyerstandardsisoc++03

Score: 29

Answers: 2

user1289

Reputation: 1321

Adding an item to the vector without creating a temporary object

c++vectorstlcompiler-optimizationc++03

Score: 2

Answers: 1

Jeremy Friesner

Reputation: 73041

How to specify a pointer-value template argument that defaults to NULL, in C++03?

c++templatesc++03default-template-argument

Score: 1

Answers: 1

Jan Schultke

Reputation: 39385

Why did C++03 allow data members with the same name as the class?

c++language-designc++03c++98

Score: 1

Answers: 1

ZSaberLv0

Reputation: 267

how to implement conditional implicit conversion for cpp03?

c++c++03

Score: 1

Answers: 1

v.oddou

Reputation: 6775

Find the smallest integer type that can count up to N

c++metaprogrammingc++03

Score: 3

Answers: 4

GiCo

Reputation: 586

Check if (primitive) types are castable in C++

c++castingc++03

Score: 14

Answers: 3

user7231709

Reputation:

C++ std:.auto_ptr or std::unique_ptr (to support multiple compilers, even old C++03 compilers)?

c++c++11smart-pointersc++03

Score: 4

Answers: 3

Tommy Herbert

Reputation: 20981

Why use = to initialise a primitive type in C++?

c++coding-stylec++03

Score: 11

Answers: 9

Galik

Reputation: 48605

Why does std::istringstream appear to resolve differently to std::ifstream in the ternary (?:) operator?

c++conditional-operatorc++03

Score: 26

Answers: 4

Rama

Reputation: 3305

Get the maximum sizeof at compile time c++03

c++c++03

Score: 2

Answers: 3

Carson Myers

Reputation: 38564

Is there any reason to use the 'auto' keyword in C++03?

c++keywordautoc++03

Score: 86

Answers: 10

Steven P.

Reputation: 1

Why is multiple variable definition across different source files a problem, but multiple class definition across different sources is not

staticglobalmemberdefinitionc++03

Score: -2

Answers: 2

PreviousPage 1Next

StackOverflow Questions for Tag: c%2B%2B03

Is removing &#39;explicit&#39; from a constructor binary compatible?

looser throw specifier for in C++

Eliminate functions from template class in C++03

How to write `is_complete` template?

Accessing an enum value in a nested templated class in C++03

Union initialization in C++ and C

Why is GCC complaining with Wstringop-overflow?

Is C++03 a new version of the C++ Standard or just a Technical Corrigendum (TC) of C++98?

Adding an item to the vector without creating a temporary object

How to specify a pointer-value template argument that defaults to NULL, in C++03?

Why did C++03 allow data members with the same name as the class?

how to implement conditional implicit conversion for cpp03?

Find the smallest integer type that can count up to N

Check if (primitive) types are castable in C++

C++ std:.auto_ptr or std::unique_ptr (to support multiple compilers, even old C++03 compilers)?

Why use = to initialise a primitive type in C++?

Why does std::istringstream appear to resolve differently to std::ifstream in the ternary (?:) operator?

Get the maximum sizeof at compile time c++03

Is there any reason to use the &#39;auto&#39; keyword in C++03?

Why is multiple variable definition across different source files a problem, but multiple class definition across different sources is not

Is removing 'explicit' from a constructor binary compatible?

Is there any reason to use the 'auto' keyword in C++03?