Reputation: 1550
In C#, I have a class, foo
, that inherits from class bar
, which in turn inherits from class foobar
.
In the foo
constructor, I want to call the foobar
constructor directly, not from a call to the bar
constructor. I tried something like this:
public foo(int i): base : base(i)
Obviously this does not work. How would you make it work, without passing through the bar
constructor?
Upvotes: 4
Views: 2751
Reputation: 13723
You can't, as you cannot skip the initialization of bar. You have to create a constructor in bar that passes your argument through. The reason is that it's bar's responsibility to decide how it wants its base class to be constructed. (The construction of the base class is part of bar's implementation, and one of the principles of object-orientation is encapsulation -- hiding implementation to the outside.)
Upvotes: 14
Reputation: 5223
+1 Agree it bar's responsibility to decide how it wants to be constructed. I came out the code like below so you can use default constructor (bar) and allow override the constructor
public class bar
{
// Original constructor
int value { get; set; }
public bar(int i)
{
this.value = i;
}
}
public abstract class foobar : bar
{
int value {get; set;}
protected foobar(int i) : base(i)
{
value = i;
}
}
public class foo : foobar
{
// New constructor
protected foo(int i)
: base(i)
{
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1473
I think you're trying to get some specific behavior from a language feature that's not designed to work that way. Kind of similar to, for example, using exceptions to control normal application flow.
Perhaps you could give us more details and then get an advice that's more appropriate to what you're trying to do.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 17327
Take whatever shared logic you want to execute out of the foobar
constructor.
Create a method in foobar
called initialize, the signature would be void initialize(int i)
Call this method from the constructor in foo
.
Of course, this won't skip the constructor in bar
.
Upvotes: 1