Wesley Skeen
Wesley Skeen

Reputation: 8295

Best way to remove the last character from a string built with stringbuilder

I have the following

data.AppendFormat("{0},",dataToAppend);

The problem with this is that I am using it in a loop and there will be a trailing comma. What is the best way to remove the trailing comma?

Do I have to change data to a string and then substring it?

Upvotes: 134

Views: 148585

Answers (13)

CodingYoshi
CodingYoshi

Reputation: 27039

Gotcha!!

Most of the answers on this question won't work if you use AppendLine like below:

var builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
builder.Length--; // Won't work
Console.Write(builder.ToString());

builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
builder.Length += -1; // Won't work
Console.Write(builder.ToString());

builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
Console.Write(builder.TrimEnd(',')); // Won't work

Fiddle Me

WHY??? @(&**(&@!!

The issue is simple but took me a while to figure it out: Because there are 2 more invisible characters at the end CR and LF (Carriage Return and Line Feed). Therefore, you need to take away 3 last characters:

var builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
builder.Length -= 3; // This will work
Console.WriteLine(builder.ToString());

In Conclusion

Use Length-- or Length -= 1 if the last method you called was Append. Use Length -= 3 if you the last method you called AppendLine.

Upvotes: 5

Pankaj
Pankaj

Reputation: 2754

How about this..

string str = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog,";
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(str);
sb.Remove(str.Length - 1, 1);

Upvotes: 17

gouravm
gouravm

Reputation: 321

Simply shortens the stringbuilder length by 1;

 StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
 sb.Length--;

i know this is not the effective way as it translates to sb = sb-1;

Alternative Effective solution

sb.Remove(starting_index, how_many_character_to_delete);

for our case it would be

sb.Remove(sb.length-1,1)

Upvotes: 0

Vlad
Vlad

Reputation: 35594

Just use

string.Join(",", yourCollection)

This way you don't need the StringBuilder and the loop.




Long addition about async case. As of 2019, it's not a rare setup when the data are coming asynchronously.

In case your data are in async collection, there is no string.Join overload taking IAsyncEnumerable<T>. But it's easy to create one manually, hacking the code from string.Join:

public static class StringEx
{
    public static async Task<string> JoinAsync<T>(string separator, IAsyncEnumerable<T> seq)
    {
        if (seq == null)
            throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(seq));

        await using (var en = seq.GetAsyncEnumerator())
        {
            if (!await en.MoveNextAsync())
                return string.Empty;

            string firstString = en.Current?.ToString();

            if (!await en.MoveNextAsync())
                return firstString ?? string.Empty;

            // Null separator and values are handled by the StringBuilder
            var sb = new StringBuilder(256);
            sb.Append(firstString);

            do
            {
                var currentValue = en.Current;
                sb.Append(separator);
                if (currentValue != null)
                    sb.Append(currentValue);
            }
            while (await en.MoveNextAsync());
            return sb.ToString();
        }
    }
}

If the data are coming asynchronously but the interface IAsyncEnumerable<T> is not supported (like the mentioned in comments SqlDataReader), it's relatively easy to wrap the data into an IAsyncEnumerable<T>:

async IAsyncEnumerable<(object first, object second, object product)> ExtractData(
        SqlDataReader reader)
{
    while (await reader.ReadAsync())
        yield return (reader[0], reader[1], reader[2]);
}

and use it:

Task<string> Stringify(SqlDataReader reader) =>
    StringEx.JoinAsync(
        ", ",
        ExtractData(reader).Select(x => $"{x.first} * {x.second} = {x.product}"));

In order to use Select, you'll need to use nuget package System.Interactive.Async. Here you can find a compilable example.

Upvotes: 55

Mike Perrenoud
Mike Perrenoud

Reputation: 67928

The simplest and most efficient way is to perform this command:

data.Length--;

by doing this you move the pointer (i.e. last index) back one character but you don't change the mutability of the object. In fact, clearing a StringBuilder is best done with Length as well (but do actually use the Clear() method for clarity instead because that's what its implementation looks like):

data.Length = 0;

again, because it doesn't change the allocation table. Think of it like saying, I don't want to recognize these bytes anymore. Now, even when calling ToString(), it won't recognize anything past its Length, well, it can't. It's a mutable object that allocates more space than what you provide it, it's simply built this way.

Upvotes: 300

bastos.sergio
bastos.sergio

Reputation: 6764

I prefer manipulating the length of the stringbuilder:

data.Length = data.Length - 1;

Upvotes: 12

studert
studert

Reputation: 137

The most simple way would be to use the Join() method:

public static void Trail()
{
    var list = new List<string> { "lala", "lulu", "lele" };
    var data = string.Join(",", list);
}

If you really need the StringBuilder, trim the end comma after the loop:

data.ToString().TrimEnd(',');

Upvotes: 3

MrB
MrB

Reputation: 424

Similar SO question here.

I liked the using a StringBuilder extension method.

RemoveLast Method

Upvotes: 2

Piotr Stapp
Piotr Stapp

Reputation: 19828

You have two options. First one is very easy use Remove method it is quite effective. Second way is to use ToString with start index and end index (MSDN documentation)

Upvotes: 2

Servy
Servy

Reputation: 203819

You should use the string.Join method to turn a collection of items into a comma delimited string. It will ensure that there is no leading or trailing comma, as well as ensure the string is constructed efficiently (without unnecessary intermediate strings).

Upvotes: 3

Eugen Rieck
Eugen Rieck

Reputation: 65342

I recommend, you change your loop algorithm:

  • Add the comma not AFTER the item, but BEFORE
  • Use a boolean variable, that starts with false, do suppress the first comma
  • Set this boolean variable to true after testing it

Upvotes: 3

DonBoitnott
DonBoitnott

Reputation: 11035

Yes, convert it to a string once the loop is done:

String str = data.ToString().TrimEnd(',');

Upvotes: 2

Sam Leach
Sam Leach

Reputation: 12966

Use the following after the loop.

.TrimEnd(',')

or simply change to

string commaSeparatedList = input.Aggregate((a, x) => a + ", " + x)

Upvotes: 13

Related Questions