Reputation: 8295
I have the following
data.AppendFormat("{0},",dataToAppend);
The problem with this is that I am using it in a loop and there will be a trailing comma. What is the best way to remove the trailing comma?
Do I have to change data to a string and then substring it?
Upvotes: 134
Views: 148585
Reputation: 27039
Most of the answers on this question won't work if you use AppendLine
like below:
var builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
builder.Length--; // Won't work
Console.Write(builder.ToString());
builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
builder.Length += -1; // Won't work
Console.Write(builder.ToString());
builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
Console.Write(builder.TrimEnd(',')); // Won't work
WHY??? @(&**(&@!!
The issue is simple but took me a while to figure it out: Because there are 2 more invisible characters at the end CR
and LF
(Carriage Return and Line Feed). Therefore, you need to take away 3 last characters:
var builder = new StringBuilder();
builder.AppendLine("One,");
builder.Length -= 3; // This will work
Console.WriteLine(builder.ToString());
In Conclusion
Use Length--
or Length -= 1
if the last method you called was Append
. Use Length -= 3
if you the last method you called AppendLine
.
Upvotes: 5
Reputation: 2754
How about this..
string str = "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog,";
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(str);
sb.Remove(str.Length - 1, 1);
Upvotes: 17
Reputation: 321
Simply shortens the stringbuilder length by 1;
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.Length--;
i know this is not the effective way as it translates to sb = sb-1;
Alternative Effective solution
sb.Remove(starting_index, how_many_character_to_delete);
for our case it would be
sb.Remove(sb.length-1,1)
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 35594
Just use
string.Join(",", yourCollection)
This way you don't need the StringBuilder
and the loop.
Long addition about async case. As of 2019, it's not a rare setup when the data are coming asynchronously.
In case your data are in async collection, there is no string.Join
overload taking IAsyncEnumerable<T>
. But it's easy to create one manually, hacking the code from string.Join
:
public static class StringEx
{
public static async Task<string> JoinAsync<T>(string separator, IAsyncEnumerable<T> seq)
{
if (seq == null)
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(seq));
await using (var en = seq.GetAsyncEnumerator())
{
if (!await en.MoveNextAsync())
return string.Empty;
string firstString = en.Current?.ToString();
if (!await en.MoveNextAsync())
return firstString ?? string.Empty;
// Null separator and values are handled by the StringBuilder
var sb = new StringBuilder(256);
sb.Append(firstString);
do
{
var currentValue = en.Current;
sb.Append(separator);
if (currentValue != null)
sb.Append(currentValue);
}
while (await en.MoveNextAsync());
return sb.ToString();
}
}
}
If the data are coming asynchronously but the interface IAsyncEnumerable<T>
is not supported (like the mentioned in comments SqlDataReader
), it's relatively easy to wrap the data into an IAsyncEnumerable<T>
:
async IAsyncEnumerable<(object first, object second, object product)> ExtractData(
SqlDataReader reader)
{
while (await reader.ReadAsync())
yield return (reader[0], reader[1], reader[2]);
}
and use it:
Task<string> Stringify(SqlDataReader reader) =>
StringEx.JoinAsync(
", ",
ExtractData(reader).Select(x => $"{x.first} * {x.second} = {x.product}"));
In order to use Select
, you'll need to use nuget package System.Interactive.Async
. Here you can find a compilable example.
Upvotes: 55
Reputation: 67928
The simplest and most efficient way is to perform this command:
data.Length--;
by doing this you move the pointer (i.e. last index) back one character but you don't change the mutability of the object. In fact, clearing a StringBuilder
is best done with Length
as well (but do actually use the Clear()
method for clarity instead because that's what its implementation looks like):
data.Length = 0;
again, because it doesn't change the allocation table. Think of it like saying, I don't want to recognize these bytes anymore. Now, even when calling ToString()
, it won't recognize anything past its Length
, well, it can't. It's a mutable object that allocates more space than what you provide it, it's simply built this way.
Upvotes: 300
Reputation: 6764
I prefer manipulating the length of the stringbuilder:
data.Length = data.Length - 1;
Upvotes: 12
Reputation: 137
The most simple way would be to use the Join() method:
public static void Trail()
{
var list = new List<string> { "lala", "lulu", "lele" };
var data = string.Join(",", list);
}
If you really need the StringBuilder, trim the end comma after the loop:
data.ToString().TrimEnd(',');
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 19828
You have two options. First one is very easy use Remove
method it is quite effective. Second way is to use ToString
with start index and end index (MSDN documentation)
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 203819
You should use the string.Join
method to turn a collection of items into a comma delimited string. It will ensure that there is no leading or trailing comma, as well as ensure the string is constructed efficiently (without unnecessary intermediate strings).
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 65342
I recommend, you change your loop algorithm:
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 11035
Yes, convert it to a string once the loop is done:
String str = data.ToString().TrimEnd(',');
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 12966
Use the following after the loop.
.TrimEnd(',')
or simply change to
string commaSeparatedList = input.Aggregate((a, x) => a + ", " + x)
Upvotes: 13