Reputation: 8607
Since isset
appears to be a function (http://php.net/manual/en/function.isset.php), there might be some overhead for calling it. So I wonder if using !== null
instead of isset
would produce faster code while, most importantly, keeping the code's behavior exactly the same?
Upvotes: 3
Views: 3460
Reputation: 1106
From PHP Manual:
isset — Determine if a variable is set and is not NULL
isset Returns TRUE if var exists and has value other than NULL, FALSE otherwise.
http://php.net/manual/en/function.isset.php
The function call overhead is so small you probably don't need to worry about it. Read this post: Why are PHP function calls *so* expensive?
Note that isset is not a function (it has a special opcode for it), so it's faster.
Upvotes: 6
Reputation: 96
as above isset is to check if a variable is set and is not NULL. To make sure I usually use it as
if( isset( $var ) === TRUE )
{
// Do what you want
}
This doesn't throw any unnecessary notices in PHP
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 4161
What about $foo = NULL, a variable can be set, and also be null
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 9082
isset
is not a function, It is a Language construct
in PHP, It is much faster.
isset
determines if a variable is set and is not NULL.
Upvotes: 0