Reputation: 1116
I'm trying to run some code using threads in standard C++ (installed with XCode) in MacOS X Mavericks. But I'm getting some errors. Here's a minimal working example:
#include <thread>
#include <iostream>
void run (int x) {
std::cout<<".";
}
int main (int argc, char const *argv[])
{
std::thread t(run);
}
The error I'm getting:
minimal.cpp:10:17: error: no matching constructor for initialization of 'std::thread'
std::thread t(run,0);
^ ~~~~~
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../lib/c++/v1/thread:372:9: note: candidate constructor template not viable: requires single argument '__f', but 2 arguments
were provided
thread::thread(_Fp __f)
^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../lib/c++/v1/thread:261:5: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 1 argument, but 2 were provided
thread(const thread&);
^
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../lib/c++/v1/thread:268:5: note: candidate constructor not viable: requires 0 arguments, but 2 were provided
thread() _NOEXCEPT : __t_(0) {}
^
1 error generated.
I've been able to track the problem to my compiler defining _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS
, which is defined because of
#if !(__has_feature(cxx_variadic_templates))
#define _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_VARIADICS
#endif
Any help would be appreciated.
Thank you!
Upvotes: 7
Views: 14145
Reputation: 577
i'm getting different std::thread behaviour running same app. on xcode or instruments (profiling), on xcode the single thread/multithread ratio is 0.6 and in instruments is 3.7 using a 4 thread array,
how is this possible?
Xcode run:
st...ok - lap: 4875 ms
st/8...ok - lap: 1205 ms
mt...ok - lap: 8330 ms
st/mt ratio:**0.6**
Instruments run:
st...ok - lap: 2182 ms
st/8...ok - lap: 545 ms
mt...ok - lap: 596 ms
st/mt ratio:**3.7**
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 1116
Thanks to pwny
and PeterT
, I figured out the error.
I just needed to compile with clang++ -std=c++11 minimal.cpp
and it worked like a charm.
I also needed a t.join()
at the end to prevent an execution error to happen.
Upvotes: 24