Reputation: 362
For some reason, I can change a buffered image by using setRGB but not by using the actual int array in the raster:
BufferedImage img = new BufferedImage(32, 32, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_RGB);
for (int y = 0; y < 32; y++) {
for (int x = 0; x < 32; x++) {
int gray = (int) (MathUtil.noise(x, y) * 255); //I have tested the noise function, and know it works fine
img.setRGB(x, y, gray << 16 | gray << 8 | gray);
}
}
BufferedImage img = new BufferedImage(32, 32, BufferedImage.TYPE_INT_RGB);
int[] data = ((DataBufferInt) img.getData().getDataBuffer()).getData();
for (int y = 0; y < 32; y++) {
for (int x = 0; x < 32; x++) {
int gray = (int) (MathUtil.noise(x, y) * 255); //I have tested the noise function, and know it works fine
data[x + y * 32] = gray << 16 | gray << 8 | gray;
}
}
public static float noise(int x, int y) {
int n = x + y * 57;
n = (n << 13) ^ n;
return Math.abs((1.0f - ((n * (n * n * 15731 + 789221) + 1376312589) & 0x7fffffff) / 1073741824.0f));
}
Nevermind I fixed it. I needed to use getRaster :P
Upvotes: 2
Views: 121
Reputation: 31710
Because when you call BufferedImage.getData()
it is returning a copy, not the actual backing array. So any changes you make directly to that array will not be reflected in the image.
From the JavaDoc for BufferedImage.getData():
Returns: a Raster that is a copy of the image data.
Edit What's interesting is what it says for the same method in the Java 6 JavaDoc, it's more explicit about the copy's effects. I wonder why they changed it?
Returns the image as one large tile. The Raster returned is a copy of the image data is not updated if the image is changed
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 61
Could the answer be as simple as the changes in the data array not being reflected in img
object?
Upvotes: 0