Anycorn
Reputation: 51465
boost lambda versus phoenix
I recently started looking at boost phoenix, as replacement for lambda. Is phoenix a full replacement for lambda, or is there some lambda functionality which is not provided by phoenix? is phoenix mature? Are there any gotcha I should know about?
my primary interest are operator composition, control statements and casts are less so
Thanks
Upvotes: 10
Views: 2127
Answers (1)
Related Questions
- What are the benefits of using Boost.Phoenix?
- using boost::lambda or boost::phoenix with std::find_if
- Motivation to use boost::phoenix::val?
- What's wrong with my Boost Phoenix lambda?
- Cannot get simplest Phoenix lambda to compile
- Is Boost.Phoenix inherently slower than the equivalent C++11 lambdas (does it use virtual calls, 'volatile' usage, etc.)?
- Static functions from boost.lambda or boost.phoenix
- Does bind() have any advantage (other than compatibility) over C++11 lambdas?
- phoenix lambda and argument dereferencing
- Difference between boost::bind, boost::lambda::bind and boost::phoenix::bind