CODEWITHSUNDEEP
pythonpandaspython-multiprocessing
gregmacfarlane
gregmacfarlane

Reputation: 2283

Parallel python iteration

I want to create a number of instances of a class based on values in a pandas.DataFrame. This I've got down.

import itertools
import multiprocessing as mp
import pandas as pd

class Toy:
    id_iter = itertools.count(1)

    def __init__(self, row):
        self.id = self.id_iter.next()
        self.type = row['type']

if __name__ == "__main__":

    table = pd.DataFrame({
        'type': ['a', 'b', 'c'],
        'number': [5000, 4000, 30000]
        })

    for index, row in table.iterrows():
        [Toy(row) for _ in range(row['number'])]

Multiprocessing Attempts

I've been able to parallelize this (sort of) by adding the following:

pool = mp.Pool(processes=mp.cpu_count())
m = mp.Manager()
q = m.Queue()

for index, row in table.iterrows():
    pool.apply_async([Toy(row) for _ in range(row['number'])])

It seems that this would be faster if the numbers in row['number'] are substantially longer than the length of table. But in my actual case, table is thousands of lines long, and each row['number'] is relatively small.

It seems smarter to try and break up table into cpu_count() chunks and iterate within the table. But now we're at the edge of my python skills.

I've tried things that the python interpreter screams at me for, like:

pool.apply_async(
        for index, row in table.iterrows(): 
        [Toy(row) for _ in range(row['number'])]
        )

Also things that "can't be pickled"

Parallel(n_jobs=4)(
    delayed(Toy)([row for _ in range(row['number'])]) \
            for index, row in table.iterrows()
)

Edit

This may gotten me a little bit closer, but still not there. I create the class instances in a separate function, 

def create_toys(row):
    [Toy(row) for _ in range(row['number'])]

....

Parallel(n_jobs=4, backend="threading")(
    (create_toys)(row) for i, row in table.iterrows()
)

but I'm told 'NoneType' object is not iterable.

Upvotes: 10

Views: 3415

Answers (1)

maxymoo
maxymoo

Reputation: 36555

It's a little bit unclear to me what the output you are expecting is. Do you just want a big list of the form

[Toy(row_1) ... Toy(row_n)]

where each Toy(row_i) appears with multiplicity row_i.number?

Based on the answer mentioned by @JD Long I think you could do something like this:

def process(df):
    L = []
    for index, row in table.iterrows():
        L += [Toy(row) for _ in range(row['number'])]
    return L

table = pd.DataFrame({
    'type': ['a', 'b', 'c']*10,
    'number': [5000, 4000, 30000]*10
    })

p = mp.Pool(processes=8)
split_dfs = np.array_split(table,8)    
pool_results = p.map(process, split_dfs)
p.close()
p.join()

# merging parts processed by different processes
result = [a for L in pool_results for a in L]

Upvotes: 3

Related Questions