Reputation: 19805
I am trying to do exactly the following:
>>> x = (1,2)
>>> y = 'hello'
>>> '%d,%d,%s' % (x[0], x[1], y)
'1,2,hello'
However, I have a long x
, more than two items, so I tried:
>>> '%d,%d,%s' % (*x, y)
but it is syntax error. What would be the proper way of doing this without indexing like the first example?
Upvotes: 22
Views: 45608
Reputation: 368924
str % ..
accepts a tuple as a right-hand operand, so you can do the following:
>>> x = (1, 2)
>>> y = 'hello'
>>> '%d,%d,%s' % (x + (y,)) # Building a tuple of `(1, 2, 'hello')`
'1,2,hello'
Your try should work in Python 3, where Additional Unpacking Generalizations
is supported, but not in Python 2.x:
>>> '%d,%d,%s' % (*x, y)
'1,2,hello'
Upvotes: 24
Reputation: 3206
Perhaps have a look at str.format().
>>> x = (5,7)
>>> template = 'first: {}, second: {}'
>>> template.format(*x)
'first: 5, second: 7'
For completeness I am also including additional unpacking generalizations described by PEP 448. The extended syntax was introduced in Python 3.5, and the following is no longer a syntax error:
>>> x = (5, 7)
>>> y = 42
>>> template = 'first: {}, second: {}, last: {}'
>>> template.format(*x, y) # valid in Python3.5+
'first: 5, second: 7, last: 42'
In Python 3.4 and below, however, if you want to pass additional arguments after the unpacked tuple, you are probably best off to pass them as named arguments:
>>> x = (5, 7)
>>> y = 42
>>> template = 'first: {}, second: {}, last: {last}'
>>> template.format(*x, last=y)
'first: 5, second: 7, last: 42'
This avoids the need to build a new tuple containing one extra element at the end.
Upvotes: 12
Reputation: 1249
I would suggest you to use str.format
instead str %
since its is "more modern" and also has a better set of features. That said what you want is:
>>> x = (1,2)
>>> y = 'hello'
>>> '{},{},{}'.format(*(x + (y,)))
1,2,hello
For all cool features of format
(and some related to %
as well) take a look at PyFormat.
Upvotes: 2