Reputation: 305
Is it possible for a shell script to test whether it was executed through source
? That is, for example,
$ source myscript.sh
$ ./myscript.sh
Can myscript.sh distinguish from these different shell environments?
Upvotes: 28
Views: 6279
Reputation: 21
I cannot add comment yet (stackexchange policies) so I add my own answer:
This one may works regardless if we do:
bash scriptname
scriptname
./scriptname
.on both bash
and mksh
.
if [ "${0##/*}" == scriptname ] # if the current name is our script
then
echo run
else
echo sourced
fi
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 487
Since all of our machines have history, I did this:
check_script_call=$(history |tail -1|grep myscript.sh )
if [ -z "$check_script_call" ];then
echo "This file should be called as a source."
echo "Please, try again this way:"
echo "$ source /path/to/myscript.sh"
exit 1
fi
Everytime you run a script (without source), your shell creates a new env without history.
If you want to care about performance you can try this:
if ! history |tail -1|grep set_vars ;then
echo -e "This file should be called as a source.\n"
echo "Please, try again this way:"
echo -e "$ source /path/to/set_vars\n"
exit 1
fi
PS: I think Kurt's answer is much more complete but I think this could help.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 501
This is what I was looking for:
[[ ${BASH_SOURCE[0]} = $0 ]] && main "$@"
Upvotes: 3
Reputation: 1
Based on Kurt Pfeifle’s answer, this works for me
if [ $SHLVL = 1 ]
then
echo 'script was sourced'
fi
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 1311
Yes it is possible. In general you can do the following:
#! /bin/bash
sourced () {
echo Sourced
}
executed () {
echo Executed
}
if [[ ${0##*/} == -* ]]; then
sourced
else
executed $@
fi
Giving the following output:
$ ./myscript
Executed
$ . ./myscript
Sourced
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 11035
This may or may not be what the asker wanted but, on a similar situation, I wanted a script to indicate that it is meant to be sourced and not directly run.
To achieve this effect my script reads:
#!/bin/echo Should be run as: source
export SOMEPATH="/some/path/on/my/system"
echo "Your environment has been set up"
So when I run it either as a command or sourced I get:
$ ./myscript.sh
Should be run as: source ./myscript.sh
$ source ./myscript.sh
Your environment has been set up
You can of course fool the script by running it as sh ./myscript.sh
, but at least it gives the correct expected behaviour on 2 out of 3 cases.
Upvotes: 15
Reputation: 1662
If you have a non-altering file path for regular users, then:
if [ "$(/bin/readlink -f "$0")" = "$KNOWN_PATH_OF_THIS_FILE" ]; then
# the file was executed
else
# the file was sourced
fi
(it can also easily be loosened to only check for the filename or whatever).
But your users need to have read permission to be able to source the file, so absolutely nothing can stop them from doing what they want with the file. But it might help them out to not use it in the wrong way.
This solution is not dependent on Bashisms.
Upvotes: 1
Reputation: 90213
I think, what Sam wants to do may be not possible.
To what degree a half-baken workaround is possible, depends on...
If I understand Sam's requirement correctly, he wants to have a 'script',
myscript
, that is...
myscript
(i.e. that has chmod a-x
);sh myscript
or
invoking bash myscript
. myscript
The first things to consider are these
myscript
) requires a first line in
the script like #!/bin/bash
or similar. This will directly determine which
installed instance of the bash executable (or symlink) will be invoked to run
the script's content. This will be a new shell process. It requires the
scriptfile itself to have the executable flag set.sh myscript
), is the same as '1.' -- except that the
executable flag does not need to be set, and said first line with the
hashbang isn't required either. The only thing needed is that the invoking
user needs read access to the scriptfile.. myscript
) is very much the
same as '1.' -- exept that it isn't a new shell that is invoked. All the
script's commands are executed in the current shell, using its environment
(and also "polluting" its environment with any (new) variables it may set or
change. (Usually this is a very dangerous thing to do: but here it could be
used to execute exit $RETURNVALUE
under certain conditions....)For '1.':
Easy to achieve: chmod a-x myscript
will prevent myscript
from being
directly executable. But this will not fullfill requirements '2.' and '3.'.
For '2.' and '3.':
Much harder to achieve. Invokations by sh myscript
require reading
privileges for the file. So an obvious way out would seem to chmod a-r
myscript
. However, this will also dis-allow '3.': you will not be able to
source the script either.
So what about writting the script in a way that uses a Bashism? A Bashism is a
specific way to do something which other shells do not understand: using
specific variables, commands etc. This could be used inside the script to
discover this condition and "do something" about it (like "display warning.txt",
"mailto admin" etc.). But there is no way in hell that this will prevent sh
or
bash
or any other shell from reading and trying to execute all the following
commands/lines written into the script unless you kill the shell by invoking
exit
.
Examples: in Bash, the environment seen by the script knows of $BASH
,
$BASH_ARGV
, $BASH_COMMAND
, $BASH_SUBSHELL
, BASH_EXECUTION_STRING
... . If
invoked by sh
(also if sourced inside a sh
), the executing shell will see
all these $BASH_*
as empty environment variables. Again, this could be used
inside the script to discover this condition and "do something"... but not
prevent the following commands from being invoked!
I'm now assuming that...
#!/bin/bash
as its first line, sh
is available and it is a symlink to bash
or dash
.This will mean the following invokations are possible, with the listed values for environment variables
vars+invok's | ./scriptname | sh scriptname | bash scriptname | . scriptname ---------------+--------------+---------------+-----------------+------------- $0 | ./scriptname | ./scriptname | ./scriptname | -bash $SHLVL | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 $SHELLOPTS | braceexpand: | (empty) | braceexpand:.. | braceexpand: $BASH | /bin/bash | (empty) | /bin/bash | /bin/bash $BASH_ARGV | (empty) | (empty) | (empty) | scriptname $BASH_SUBSHELL | 0 | (empty) | 0 | 0 $SHELL | /bin/bash | /bin/bash | /bin/bash | /bin/bash $OPTARG | (empty) | (empty) | (emtpy) | (emtpy)
Now you could put a logic into your text script:
$0
is not equal to -bash
, then do an exit $SOMERETURNVALUE
.In case the script was called via sh myscript
or bash myscript
, then it will
exit the calling shell. In case it was run in the current shell, it will
continue to run. (Warning: in case the script has any other exit
statements,
your current shell will be 'killed'...)
So put into your non-executable myscript.txt
near its beginning something like
this may do something close to your goal:
echo BASH=$BASH
test x${BASH} = x/bin/bash && echo "$? : FINE.... You're using 'bash ...'"
test x${BASH} = x/bin/bash || echo "$? : RATS !!! -- You're not using BASH and I will kick you out!"
test x${BASH} = x/bin/bash || exit 42
test x"${0}" = x"-bash" && echo "$? : FINE.... You've sourced me, and I'm your login shell."
test x"${0}" = x"-bash" || echo "$? : RATS !!! -- You've not sourced me (or I'm not your bash login shell) and I will kick you out!"
test x"${0}" = x"-bash" || exit 33
Upvotes: 40
Reputation: 98469
In the first case, $0
will be "myscript.sh". In the second case, it will be "./myscript". But, in general, there's no way to tell source
was used.
If you tell us what you're trying to do, instead of how you want to do it, a better answer might be forthcoming.
Upvotes: 0