Reputation: 229
I have a map that looks like
map<string , map<int,int>>
the string contains name of a student, the nested map contains ID as key and age as value. When I print the map, it al prints values as it should.
However, I want to find a students with a certain ID and lower. I tried using lower_bound using:
for( auto &x : class ){
auto it = x.second.upper_bound(some_number);
for( ; it != x .second.begin() ; --it){
cout << x.first << " = " << << it -> first << " " <<it -> second << endl;
}
}
This indeed prints right names of students, but their IDs and ages are just zeros or random numbers, what is causing this behavior? It works when I just print it.
I tried to found out about this on cpp map reference but found nothing.
Upvotes: 1
Views: 106
Reputation: 50016
What you see is probably undefined behaviour, std::map::upper_bound returns also end iterator under some conditions and from your code it does not look like you check for this condition. Also you should not use class
keyword as variable name for your map, I am preety sure it does not compile. Below is a sample code that should work with no UB and print all IDs less than some number including this ID:
http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/efae1ae4faa3e656
map< string , map<int,int>> classes ={
{ "k1", {{1,1},{2,2},{3,3}} }
};
//int class;
int some_number = 4;
for( auto &x : classes ){
auto it_num_end = x.second.upper_bound(some_number); // some numberis just variable that contains number
for( auto it = x.second.begin(); it != it_num_end ; ++it){
cout << x.first << " = " << it -> first << " " <<it -> second << endl;
}
}
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 2269
Following code solves your problem:
for( auto &x : Class ){
auto it = x.second.upper_bound(some_number);
while(it!=x.second.begin()){
it=prev(it);
cout<< x.first<< " = "<< it->first<< " "<< it->second<< endl;
}
}
Refer std::map::upper_bound
What above code does is, first it finds the iterator with id strictly greater than some_number
. Now because we want to print "students with a certain ID and lower", we print all the id's lower than the return value of upper_bound
.
The stopping condition is that if iterator is itself x.second.begin()
, that means now we don't have any id's smaller than it.
Plus your data structure is strange, you should have student ID as your primary index.
map<int, pair<string,int> >
would be more appropriate data structure. (Assuming unique id's which is mostly the case).
Although, you could do lot better using OOP concepts.
Upvotes: 2