Reputation: 1933
My apologies if my question is too basic, but after some time looking for an answer, I had nowhere to go but here.
Suppose the following classes in an ontology (expressed in an OWL 2 file):
<owl:Class rdf:ID="ClasseOne">
</owl:Class>
<owl:Class rdf:ID="ClasseTwo">
</owl:Class>
What I have is 1000 instances of ClassOne
and 5000 instances of ClassTwo
. In my reality all the ClassOne
instances are related in the very same way (let's say the relationship is named "isRelatedTo") to all the instances of ClassTwo
.
My idea was to declare a class relation and use it in the declaration of ClassOne
, instead of having an ObjectProperty that should have its value declared in each ClassOne
instance.
How to accomplish that?
Thanks in advance!
Upvotes: 1
Views: 211
Reputation: 8465
Classes are not related by properties in OWL except for subsumption/equivalence. Usually, individuals of a class A
are related to individuals of a class B
by a property p
, e.g. A(a1), B(b1), p(a1, b1)
states that an individual a1
of class A
is related by p
to an individual b1
of class B
.
You could express something like any individual of A has a relationship p
to an individual of B by using a subclass axiom with an OWL class expression as super class, e.g.
Class: A
SubClassOf: p some B
(in Manchester OWL Syntax here)
Note, that this doesn't necessary mean the other way around, i.e. the direction matters.
Upvotes: 2