Reputation: 381
In my ontology I have a class Parent
and a class Child
. I have an object property isChildOf(Child, Parent)
.
I'd like to express a new class, FatherWithTwoOrMoreChildren
, which corresponds to the class of Parent
having at least 2 Child
.
Declaration(Class(p:FatherWithTwoOrMoreChildren))
SubClassOf(p:FatherWithTwoOrMoreChildren
ObjectSomeValueFrom(ObjectPropertyAssertion(ObjectMinCardinality(2
p:isChildOf) owl:Thing))
My doubt is if I'm expressing it correctly, or if calling ObjectPropertyAssertion
I'm changing isChildOf
's definition.
Upvotes: 0
Views: 66
Reputation: 1481
Easiest way is to define :FatherWithTwoOrMoreChildren
as :
:hasChild owl:inverseOf :isChildOf
:FatherWithTwoOrMoreChildren owl:equivalentClass (:hasChild min 2 :Child)
But maybe don't you want to create a hasChild
objectproperty.
Upvotes: 1