balteo
balteo

Reputation: 24659

Issue with DateTimeParseException when using STRICT resolver style

I am trying to parse a date string using the following pattern: yyMMdd and the STRICT resolver as follows:

DateTimeFormatter formatter = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern(dateFormat).withResolverStyle(ResolverStyle.STRICT);
LocalDate.parse(expiryDate, formatter);

I get the following DateTimeParseException:

java.time.format.DateTimeParseException: Text '160501' could not be parsed: Unable to obtain LocalDate from TemporalAccessor: {YearOfEra=2016, MonthOfYear=5, DayOfMonth=1},ISO of type java.time.format.Parsed

When I switch to the default resolve style, i.e. ResolverStyle.SMART it allows such dates as 30th of February.

Can someone please help?

Upvotes: 10

Views: 5681

Answers (2)

Anonymous
Anonymous

Reputation: 86139

While JodaStephen has nicely explained the reason for the exception and given one good solution (use uu rather than yy), I am offering a couple of other possible solutions:

  1. The obvious one that you probably don’t want: leave the resolver style at SMART (the default). In other words either leave out .withResolverStyle(ResolverStyle.STRICT) completely or change it to .withResolverStyle(ResolverStyle.SMART).
  2. Provide a default era.

For the second option here is a code example:

    DateTimeFormatter formatter = new DateTimeFormatterBuilder()
            .appendPattern("yyMMdd")
            .parseDefaulting(ChronoField.ERA, 1)
            .toFormatter()
            .withResolverStyle(ResolverStyle.STRICT);

    String expiryDate = "160501";
    LocalDate result = LocalDate.parse(expiryDate, formatter);
    
    System.out.println(result);

Output is:

2016-05-01

Where the last solution may make a difference compared to using uu in the format pattern:

  1. It allows us to use a format pattern that is given to us where we cannot control whether pattern letter u or y is used.
  2. With pattern letter y it will fail with an exception if the string contains a negative year. Depending on your situation and requirements this may be desirable or unacceptable.

Edit: The second argument to parseDefaulting() may also be written IsoEra.CE.getValue() rather than just 1 to make it clear that we are specifying the current era (CE; also often called Anno Domini or AD).

Upvotes: 5

JodaStephen
JodaStephen

Reputation: 63355

The strict resolver requires an era to go with YearOfEra. Change your pattern to use "u" instead of "y" and it will work, ie. "uuMMdd".

Upvotes: 19

Related Questions