Reputation: 65
In the following RDF sample, I would like to get a value of one of properties according to a condition. The condition is below:
referProperty
is "ex:sender"
, then I get a value of property ex:sender
. referProperty
is "ex:reciever"
, then I get a value of property ex:reciever
. @prefix ex: <http://www.example.org#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .
ex:mail1
ex:sender "John"^^xsd:string ;
ex:receiver "Bill"^^xsd:string ;
ex:paymentType ex:paymentType1 .
ex:mail2
ex:sender "Jack"^^xsd:string ;
ex:receiver "Tom"^^xsd:string ;
ex:paymentType ex:paymentType2 .
ex:paymentType1
ex:paymentTypeDescription "PREPAID"^^xsd:string ;
ex:referProperty "ex:sender"^^xsd:string .
ex:paymentType2
ex:paymentTypeDescription "COLLECT"^^xsd:string ;
ex:referProperty "ex:receiver"^^xsd:string .
Sparql to get a value is below:
PREFIX ex:<http://ww....ex#>
SELECT ?mail ?refProp ?payer
WHERE
{
{
SELECT ?mail ?refProp
WHERE
{
?mail ex:paymentType / ex:referProperty ?refProp.
}
}
?mail ?refProp ?payer.
}
It is possible to get a value by the Sparql. But I question that the way using the above RDF sample and Sparql is irregular, because it seems to extends outside first-order predicate logic. Using a value which was gotten from literal node as a variable to search a property is irregular. In theory, property”ex:referProperty” should be defined in RDFS. Do you think so? If you think so, teach me a regular way which includes right RDF and right Sparql.
Upvotes: 1
Views: 712
Reputation: 11479
Option 1
One can transform URIs to strings and vice versa using STR()
, IRI()
and REPLACE()
:
PREFIX ex: <http://www.example.org#>
SELECT ?mail ?str ?payer {
?mail ?p ?payer; ex:paymentType/ex:referProperty ?str.
FILTER (replace(str(?p), str(ex:), "ex:") = ?str)
}
or
PREFIX ex: <http://www.example.org#>
SELECT ?mail ?str ?payer {
?mail ?p ?payer; ex:paymentType/ex:referProperty ?str.
FILTER (URI(replace(?str, "ex:", str(ex:))) = ?p)
}
Option 2
You can implement your conditions using BIND
and IF
:
PREFIX ex: <http://www.example.org#>
SELECT ?mail ?str ?payer {
?mail ex:paymentType/ex:referProperty ?str.
BIND (IF(?str = "ex:sender", ex:sender, ex:receiver) AS ?p)
?mail ?p ?payer.
}
Option 3
Use VALUES
:
PREFIX ex: <http://www.example.org#>
SELECT ?mail ?str ?payer {
VALUES (?str ?uri) {("ex:sender" ex:sender) ("ex:receiver" ex:receiver)}
?mail ?uri ?payer; ex:paymentType/ex:referProperty ?str.
}
Option 4
As suggested by Damyan Ognyanov, you could use URIs instead of strings in your reference data, i. e. ex:sender
instead of "ex:sender"
etc. Then your query will be simply the following:
PREFIX ex: <http://www.example.org#>
SELECT ?mail ?str ?payer {
?mail ?uri ?payer; ex:paymentType/ex:referProperty ?uri.
}
Update
From your comment:
Isn’t using
ex:sender
as property and object in one RDF contradiction? Usingex:sender
as URI in RDF makes the border between RDF an RDFS dubious.
From RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax:
The set of nodes of an RDF graph is the set of subjects and objects of triples in the graph.
It is possible for a predicate IRI to also occur as a node in the same graph.
In RDF, "properties" (or rather their "types") are first-class objects.
RDFS is rather a vocabulary (which introduces e. g. the notion of rdf:Property
) than a schema.
There is no clear distinction between "ABox" and "TBox" in RDF.
Upvotes: 1