Reputation: 1282
I am trying to interactively rebase commits from the branch tmp/20241220-rebase-source
onto tmp/20241220-rebase-target
.
The commits to rebase include a branching point and corresponding merge-commit (ba87116b). This is how tmp/20241220-rebase-source
looks like:
* 1df0fff2
* f2659d53
* ba87116b <-- I believe this commit contained merge conflicts, which were fixed manually; but I want to rebase the commit as is
|\
| * decacca4
* | 22820e76
|/
* 212d1db1
* 304733f0
* e7d2ed57
* 78fd41bf
* 15251fab
* 6854d87c
* 53d2b1c8
* fbf44673
* 911afc16
* bb56930f
* 75d7085d
* 23674b1a <- commit is already cherry-picked into `tmp/20241220-rebase-target`, to fix a merge conflict (the following commits do to touch this file and thus there cannot be a merge conflict)
| <- other commits to ignore from rebase, below
|
I cherry-picked the first commit (23674b1a), because it caused a merge-conflict in a single file, which I fixed manually. All other commits /add/ new files and hence should not produce merge conflicts.
git checkout tmp/20241220-rebase-source
git rebase --rebase-merges --onto tmp/20241220-rebase-target --interactive 23674b1a
Running the rebase script results in merge conflicts for the merge commit ba87116b
:
(tmp/20241220-rebase-source)> git rebase --rebase-merges --onto tmp/20241220-rebase-target --interactive 23674b1af2c7d4451ba5a5b788e91fcaf9d3e90d
Auto-merging example_form_xml/form1/file1.xml
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in example_form_xml/form1/file1.xml
Auto-merging example_form_xml/form1/file2.xml
CONFLICT (add/add): Merge conflict in example_form_xml/form1/file2.xml
Could not apply ba87116b...
I belive this this issue is caused, because the original merge commit ba87116b
contained conflicts, which were resolved manually and that I have resolve them again in the rebase. But this is not my desired behavior, since I just want to rebase the commit as is.
Is this possible and if so, how do I achieve this?
Upvotes: 1
Views: 38
Reputation: 30297
This is not the most elegant approach to solving it but it will allow you to move forward. If you think about it, ba87116b
is just what code would look like if you had developed decacca4
on top of 22820e76
(or viceversa) instead of 212d1db1
. Being that the case, I would straighten that branch before I tried the rebase:
git rebase 212d1db1 1df0fff2
Use the right branch name as the second commit id over there.
What should happen when you run this rebase is that it should stop on conflicts when applying either 22820e76
or decacca4
(whichever was applied second). When that happens, just take advantage of the tree in ba87116b
as that is the resulting code that should be there, no need to redo the conflicts by hand:
git restore --source=ba87116b --worktree --staged -- .
git rebase --continue
And that should allow the rebase to finish.... and now you can rebase the branch as it is a straight line and you have incorporated the previous conflict resolution in your straightened branch.
Upvotes: 3