Reputation: 12870
When reading this question, i was wondering why anybody uses ex as a measurement for the width of an element. I understand that ex represents the height of a lowercase x, so i can use it to define the height of a input-box - for example.
But why would anybody use ex for the width of this box? Isn't that possibly wrong depending on the type? And why shouldn't I just use em in this case?
Upvotes: 0
Views: 127
Reputation: 239674
The height and width of elements are usually best specified considering both at the same time, to achieve "pleasing" ratios (e.g. 16:9, or the golden ratio). So just because ex
is specified in terms of a height, it doesn't make it less useful for specifying a particular width.
And you shouldn't use em
instead, since it's the width of the upper case M. It's highly unlikely that the two measurements are the same.
As a corollary, you'll find plenty of example layouts that specify heights in terms on em
s, which is again because they're considering the ratios between heights and widths.
Upvotes: 2
Reputation: 8694
What @Andrei Bârsan said and, further, because few characters are as wide as 'em', you can use 'en' as a width specifier. 'en' will give you the width of any digit.
Upvotes: -1
Reputation: 3523
Since ex refers to height, rather than width, using it to set a width seems to be simply an error, imho. You should just use em to make the width relative to the text's width.
Hope this helps. :)
Upvotes: 0