Reputation: 28803
C++11 added some new string conversion functions:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/string/basic_string/stoul
It includes stoi (string to int), stol (string to long), stoll (string to long long), stoul (string to unsigned long), stoull (string to unsigned long long). Notable in its absence is a stou (string to unsigned) function. Is there some reason it is not needed but all of the others are?
related: No "sto{short, unsigned short}" functions in C++11?
Upvotes: 132
Views: 31454
Reputation: 29
unsigned long ulval = std::stoul(buf);
unsigned long mask = ~0xffffffffl;
unsigned int uival;
if( (ulval & mask) == 0 )
uival = (unsigned int)ulval;
else {
...range error...
}
Using masks to do this with the expected value size in bits expressed in the mask, will make this work for 64-bit longs vs 32-bit ints, but also for 32-bit longs vs 32-bit ints.
In the case of 64-bit longs, ~0xffffffffl will become 0xffffffff00000000 and will thus see if any of the top 32 bits are set. With 32-bit longs, it ~0xffffffffl becomes 0x00000000 and the mask check will always be zero.
Upvotes: 0
Reputation: 477100
The most pat answer would be that the C library has no corresponding “strtou
”, and the C++11 string functions are all just thinly veiled wrappers around the C library functions: The std::sto*
functions mirror strto*
, and the std::to_string
functions use sprintf
.
Edit: As KennyTM points out, both stoi
and stol
use strtol
as the underlying conversion function, but it is still mysterious why while there exists stoul
that uses strtoul
, there is no corresponding stou
.
Upvotes: 42
Reputation: 254471
I've no idea why stoi
exists but not stou
, but the only difference between stoul
and a hypothetical stou
would be a check that the result is in the range of unsigned
:
unsigned stou(std::string const & str, size_t * idx = 0, int base = 10) {
unsigned long result = std::stoul(str, idx, base);
if (result > std::numeric_limits<unsigned>::max()) {
throw std::out_of_range("stou");
}
return result;
}
(Likewise, stoi
is also similar to stol
, just with a different range check; but since it already exists, there's no need to worry about exactly how to implement it.)
Upvotes: 28