StackOverflow Questions for Tag: standard-layout

Armen Tsirunyan

Reputation: 133092

What are aggregates and trivial types/PODs, and how/why are they special?

c++c++11aggregatec++17standard-layout

Score: 708

Answers: 6

Leon

Reputation: 2069

C++ struct with anonymous union

c++variantstandard-layouttrivially-copyable

Score: 1

Answers: 1

The Floating Brain

Reputation: 966

Anonymous Unions in C++ Contiguous Memory Layout

c++standardsanonymousmemory-layoutstandard-layout

Score: 1

Answers: 2

Arek' Fu

Reputation: 857

Casting an array of standard-layout objects to array of elements

c++arrayscastingstandard-layout

Score: 2

Answers: 2

lei hu

Reputation: 323

What reasons cause a class C, which inherits from class A and has only one member variable of type B, not to be a standard-layout class?

c++c++11clangstandard-layout

Score: 3

Answers: 0

skypjack

Reputation: 50548

Why is std::is_pod deprecated in C++20?

c++type-traitsstandard-layouttrivially-copyable

Score: 136

Answers: 1

Dan

Reputation: 2886

Is casting a struct to an integer legal?

c++structlanguage-lawyerstandard-layout

Score: 2

Answers: 1

esam

Reputation: 610

Is it legal to access private non-static first data member of a standard layout class?

c++access-modifiersstandard-layout

Score: 2

Answers: 1

Nik Polin

Reputation: 11

How to define a type so it can be static initialized?

c++static-initializationstandard-layouttrivially-copyable

Score: 1

Answers: 1

Michele Piccolini

Reputation: 2953

Trivial class that is not standard layout and vice versa

c++c++11standard-layouttrivially-copyable

Score: 1

Answers: 0

dyp

Reputation: 39141

Common initial sequence and alignment

c++c++11unionsmemory-alignmentstandard-layout

Score: 14

Answers: 3

François Andrieux

Reputation: 29032

Using standard layout types to communicate with other languages

c++language-lawyerstandard-layout

Score: 2

Answers: 1

Arthur R.

Reputation: 383

"Merge" PODs into one

c++inheritancereflectionstructured-bindingsstandard-layout

Score: 1

Answers: 1

lisyarus

Reputation: 15567

Guaranteed memory layout for standard layout struct with a single array member of primitive type

c++language-lawyermemory-layoutstandard-layout

Score: 27

Answers: 2

TRISAbits

Reputation: 465

C++ Standard Layout and References

c++standard-layout

Score: 7

Answers: 1

jmishra

Reputation: 2081

Standard Layout c++

c++c++11standard-layout

Score: 20

Answers: 1

spraff

Reputation: 33445

Why is C++11's POD "standard layout" definition the way it is?

c++c++11standard-layout

Score: 56

Answers: 6

M.M

Reputation: 141648

Does C++20 remove the requirement for class members to be in ascending order?

c++classlanguage-lawyerc++20standard-layout

Score: 45

Answers: 1

Brian Bi

Reputation: 119467

Is being a POD type exactly equivalent to being a trivial, standard-layout type?

c++language-lawyerc++20standard-layout

Score: 22

Answers: 2

Tristan Brindle

Reputation: 16834

Why must members of standard layout classes have the same access control?

c++language-lawyerstandard-layout

Score: 3

Answers: 1

PreviousPage 1Next

StackOverflow Questions for Tag: standard-layout

What are aggregates and trivial types/PODs, and how/why are they special?

C++ struct with anonymous union

Anonymous Unions in C++ Contiguous Memory Layout

Casting an array of standard-layout objects to array of elements

What reasons cause a class C, which inherits from class A and has only one member variable of type B, not to be a standard-layout class?

Why is std::is_pod deprecated in C++20?

Is casting a struct to an integer legal?

Is it legal to access private non-static first data member of a standard layout class?

How to define a type so it can be static initialized?

Trivial class that is not standard layout and vice versa

Common initial sequence and alignment

Using standard layout types to communicate with other languages

&quot;Merge&quot; PODs into one

Guaranteed memory layout for standard layout struct with a single array member of primitive type

C++ Standard Layout and References

Standard Layout c++

Why is C++11&#39;s POD &quot;standard layout&quot; definition the way it is?

Does C++20 remove the requirement for class members to be in ascending order?

Is being a POD type exactly equivalent to being a trivial, standard-layout type?

Why must members of standard layout classes have the same access control?

"Merge" PODs into one

Why is C++11's POD "standard layout" definition the way it is?