Reputation: 41
I have some doubts about the use of the conversions from std_logic_vector
to signed
/unsigned
. I always use the conversion signed(...)
, unsigned(...)
, but when I try to use the conversions defined in the library numeric_std
(to_signed
, to unsigned
), it doesn't work. Can someone explain to me why this happens? And why the conversion unsigned()
and signed()
works?
Upvotes: 4
Views: 65467
Reputation: 1373
Because the std_logic_vector
and signed
/unsigned
types are closely related, you can use the typecast way to convert. So signed(a_std_logic_vector)
and unsigned(a_std_logic_vector)
are okay. However, the functions to convert are also defined in the standard.
Take a look at the VHDL FAQ. This is an old website from the days that newsgroups were still hot, but it still has plenty of good information about VHDL.
Upvotes: 7
Reputation:
Look at the package spec for numeric_std. You will find that to_signed converts to signed ... from integer.
As "vermaete" says, signed is a closely related type to std_logic_vector so you don't need a conversion function there.
Upvotes: 2