Reputation: 3437
Is there a way with NumPy/SciPy` to keep only the histogram modes when extracting the local maxima (shown as blue dots on the image below)?:
These maxima were extracted using scipy.signal.argrelmax
, but I only need to get the two modes values and ignore the rest of the maxima detected:
# calculate dB positive image
img_db = 10 * np.log10(img)
img_db_pos = img_db + abs(np.min(img_db))
data = img_db_pos.flatten() + 1
# data histogram
n, bins = np.histogram(data, 100, normed=True)
# trim data
x = np.linspace(np.min(data), np.max(data), num=100)
# find index of minimum between two modes
ind_max = argrelmax(n)
x_max = x[ind_max]
y_max = n[ind_max]
# plot
plt.hist(data, bins=100, normed=True, color='y')
plt.scatter(x_max, y_max, color='b')
plt.show()
Note:
I've managed to use this Smoothing filter to get a curve that matches the histogram (but I don't have the equation of the curve).
Upvotes: 8
Views: 8441
Reputation: 13733
This could be achieved by appropriately adjusting parameter order
of function argrelmax
, i.e. by adjusting how many points on each side are considered to detect local maxima.
I've used this code to create mock data (you can play around with the values of the different variables to figure out their effect on the generated histogram):
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from scipy.signal import argrelextrema, argrelmax
m = 50
s = 10
samples = 50000
peak_start = 30
peak_width = 10
peak_gain = 4
np.random.seed(3)
data = np.random.normal(loc=m, scale=s, size=samples)
bell, edges = np.histogram(data, bins=np.arange(2*(m + 1) - .5), normed=True)
x = np.int_(.5*(edges[:-1] + edges[1:]))
bell[peak_start + np.arange(peak_width)] *= np.linspace(1, peak_gain, peak_width)
plt.bar(x, bell)
plt.show()
As shown below, it is important to carefully select the value of order
. Indeed, if order
is too small you are likely to detect noisy local maxima, whereas if order
is too large you might fail to detect some of the modes.
In [185]: argrelmax(bell, order=1)
Out[185]: (array([ 3, 5, 7, 12, 14, 39, 47, 51, 86, 90], dtype=int64),)
In [186]: argrelmax(bell, order=2)
Out[186]: (array([14, 39, 47, 51, 90], dtype=int64),)
In [187]: argrelmax(bell, order=3)
Out[187]: (array([39, 47, 51], dtype=int64),)
In [188]: argrelmax(bell, order=4)
Out[188]: (array([39, 51], dtype=int64),)
In [189]: argrelmax(bell, order=5)
Out[189]: (array([39, 51], dtype=int64),)
In [190]: argrelmax(bell, order=11)
Out[190]: (array([39, 51], dtype=int64),)
In [191]: argrelmax(bell, order=12)
Out[191]: (array([39], dtype=int64),)
These results are strongly dependent on the shape of the histogram (if you change just one of the parameters used to generate data the range of valid values for order
may vary). To make mode detection more robust, I would recommend you to pass a smoothed histogram to argrelmax
rather than the original histogram.
Upvotes: 12
Reputation: 375
I guess, you want to find second largest number in y_max
. Hope this example will help you:
np.random.seed(4) # for reproducibility
data = np.zeros(0)
for i in xrange(10):
data = np.hstack(( data, np.random.normal(i, 0.25, 100*i) ))
# data histogram
n, bins = np.histogram(data, 100, normed=True)
# trim data
x = np.linspace(np.min(data), np.max(data), num=100)
# find index of minimum between two modes
ind_max = argrelmax(n)
x_max = x[ind_max]
y_max = n[ind_max]
# find first and second max values in y_max
index_first_max = np.argmax(y_max)
maximum_y = y_max[index_first_max]
second_max_y = max(n for n in y_max if n!=maximum_y)
index_second_max = np.where(y_max == second_max_y)
# plot
plt.hist(data, bins=100, normed=True, color='y')
plt.scatter(x_max, y_max, color='b')
plt.scatter(x_max[index_first_max], y_max[index_first_max], color='r')
plt.scatter(x_max[index_second_max], y_max[index_second_max], color='g')
plt.show()
Upvotes: 8