CODEWITHSUNDEEP
signalsvhdl
dukecitypal
dukecitypal

Reputation: 11

vhdl signal assignment in a testbench

Even after doing an extensive research in the web, I have not come across a clean explanation of how signal assignment happens in a vhdl testbench with wait statements.

Could somebody please elaborate how does it work?

For e.g. within the process I have something like this:

wait until spi_sck = '1';
wait until spi_sck = '0';
tb_rx_bytes(7) <= spi_mosi;

How can I make sure the tb_rx_byte assignment happens?

More specifically, my problem is that the last tb_rx_bytes does not get set to the spi_mosi assignment.

for j in 31 downto 0 loop
  wait until spi_sck = '1';
  wait until spi_sck = '0';
  tb_rx_bytes(j) <= spi_mosi;
end loop;

Upvotes: 1

Views: 1021

Answers (2)

wahab
wahab

Reputation: 835

This is one of the things which confuses some people when they start working with VHDL, particularly those with a background in programming languages. In VHDL, signal assignments are not updated immediately like programming languages. Instead, the assignments are booked, and the signal values are updated when the process suspends. That happens when

  1. The process runs to its end, and then waits for one of the signals in its sensitively list to change. or
  2. When it encounters a wait statement.

So, in your case the value of tb_rx_bytes will be updated except bit 0, which is only booked for update in the last iteration of the loop. But the value is not updated, until one of the two conditions mentioned above are met.

Upvotes: 0

Renaud Pacalet
Renaud Pacalet

Reputation: 28965

In order to see the effect of your signal assignment 3 conditions must hold successively:

  1. there is an event (value change) on spi_sck and the new value is '1'
  2. there is an event (value change) on spi_sck and the new value is '0'
  3. some physical time elapses such that the assignment has a visible effect

I guess it is the last condition that fails and prevents the last assignment from having visible effects. Add a wait for 1 ns; after your end loop; statement.

Upvotes: 1

Related Questions